Vain

PR Comic Con: A lot of Do's and a few Don'ts: The PRCC 2013 Guide

Thu, 16 May 2013 18:15:26 -0400

PR Comic Con: A lot of Do's and a few Don'ts: The PRCC 2013 Guide:

Here are some important points that can make you enjoy the event even more. Remember, we are expecting thousands of people and we want everyone to have fun. Please share this information with your friends!

Do’s!!!

• Buy your tickets before the show. The lines at the ticket…

Another Year, Another PRCC~! :)

Photo

Wed, 15 May 2013 10:13:02 -0400

Ḻ ℮cтri¢iтy: COSPLAYERS AND EVERYONE ELSE - SPREAD THE WORD.

Sun, 05 May 2013 13:12:47 -0400

Ḻ ℮cтri¢iтy: COSPLAYERS AND EVERYONE ELSE - SPREAD THE WORD.:

lectricity:

PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD.
Cosplay is NOT a competition. Cosplay is NOT about being “hot”.
Cosplay is about being REPRESENTATIVE OF CHARACTER and HAVING FUN.
In this example, no, neither of them look exactly identical to the character, but you can tell who it’s supposed to be immediately, and…

whycantithinkofacoolname: sillylaureate: theknighttoyourtime: ...

Wed, 01 May 2013 23:36:44 -0400

whycantithinkofacoolname:

sillylaureate:

theknighttoyourtime:

super-scout:

aetropos:

starexorcist:

tehmostaewsumblogevar:

starexorcist:

ecrusher:

10knotes:

M&Ms Droplets

now that’s what photography should be about… not a black and white picture of someone’s shoes

The top picture is full of M&M’s. They’re bule, red, orange, green, yellow, and brown.

But in the bottom picture we clearly see there’s white, pink, and even purple candies in the bowl.

The bottom picture is of gumballs! This concludes that the bottom picture is not taken with that camera at all. I’d even go as far to say that it was edited in photoshop with a filter!

Yes the above image and the below image are not the same photograph being taken. This is rather obvious.

BUT Mr. Wright there is one thing you overlooked. Examine the droplets on the bottom image. None of them are from the same angle. This is a natural occurance when looking through water droplets.

Is it not possible that the photographer took the second image first?

Would it not be more probable that when asked HOW it was taken he/she took the above image of their setup Using M&Ms, something much more common in a household rather than many gumballs, something they may have just bought for the original photo?

So to claim it was not taken with the same camera is indeed a long shot Mr. Wright.

Thank you for your time.

Really Edgeworth, is that you’re argument.

Aren’t you overlooking the fact that there are no pink M&Ms. This proves undeniably that these are not, in fact M&Ms, but some other kind of candy.

And one other thing, I find it highly improbable that not one piece of candy is facing so the M logo is on the candy.

So in conclusion, there is no way these are possibly M&Ms.

hey mister I think you’re confuuuuuuused. Edgeworth agreed that they weren’t M&M’s. He was just refuting that there is a possibility there wasnt any photoshop used and that the above image was only depicting the method used in the bottom image.

I think someone might be getting a little senile hehehe

Everyone seems to be walking around the accusations by examining whether they are or aren’t M&Ms. That is not what’s important. What we should be looking at is instead, the so-called droplets, compared to the background image.

The angles within the droplets do not realistically coincide with one another! As well, I don’t spend much time staring at drops of water, but I can surely say I’ve never seen such clarity in any water droplet. Also, as in the former picture, there is an obvious fogging on the glass, surely caused by whichever process was used to spray the water. Where is the fog?

On top of all that, the drops are amazingly tiny compared to the anonymous-candy. One could argue the sheet is further away than in the ‘example’ pic, but the blurring of the candies definitely objects to that. We could also try to assume that the spray method used in the ‘original’ photo caused much tinier water spots, but are we to believe that the photographer was so careless that they couldn’t recreate the correct droplet size in the ‘example’? Surely, they should have been able to cause at least a closer resemblance.

Sure seems like they went out of their way to showcase the methodology of how the photograph was taken, yet neglected to go far enough to ensure it could be a like-comparison?

Rather unlikely!

Actually, Mr. Godot!!

Well, according to the properties of light and the way it’s refracted…

If you mirror it the right way, they line up just fine!

Hold on there, pups. You’re all going in completely different directions. Shih-na, if you will?

Lang Zi says: “The truth lies not at the exit, but rather, shines outside the maze itself.”

You need to see past the boundaries given to you in order to figure out the actual purpose and, as much as I’d hate to admit, both Mr. Prosecutor and the crow-girl have some pretty tame ground under their feet with those assumptions.

As said before, it’s logical to assume the photographer is merely depicting the method used in order to get the results shown in the second photo—and it can be just that.

But what if it’s something else entirely?

We’re all wolves who’ve been swindled by the coyote that has stolen our kill. How do we know if the photographer just isn’t using some clever ploy to get us all confused? He could have taken these pictures separately and simply put them together with getting us riled up in mind.

I think we all need to reconsider our options, here.

Casually brings it back.

amazing use of gifs, ladies and gentleman

teilwal: The new 3DSXL looks like a poptart to me.

Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:51:21 -0400

teilwal:

The new 3DSXL looks like a poptart to me.

Photo

Sun, 14 Apr 2013 07:06:53 -0400

lividdoll: DJ Pon-3: MeSpike The Dragon :...

Sun, 07 Apr 2013 17:26:06 -0400

lividdoll:

DJ Pon-3: Me
Spike The Dragon : Ex-Shadow
Rarity: Malindachan

stars-lullaby: aaaorangenime: I AM SO DONE Me too. lol xD

Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:35:12 -0400

stars-lullaby:

aaaorangenime:

I AM SO DONE

Me too. lol xD

Check out Fire Emblem Awakening via Club Nintendo

Sun, 27 Jan 2013 11:33:40 -0500

Check out Fire Emblem Awakening via Club Nintendo

Check out Nintendo Land via Club Nintendo

Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:23:15 -0500

Check out Nintendo Land via Club Nintendo

Check out Wii U Deluxe via Club Nintendo

Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:30:34 -0500

Check out Wii U Deluxe via Club Nintendo

Photo

Fri, 07 Sep 2012 23:49:49 -0400

schmallison: Elena’s Tarrlok cosplay that she’ll be debuting at...

Fri, 07 Sep 2012 23:48:06 -0400

schmallison:

Elena’s Tarrlok cosplay that she’ll be debuting at Connecticon! :D

kireinami: Friends forever! ♫Ichimichi Mao and Yui Koike[...

Mon, 20 Feb 2012 02:55:18 -0500

kireinami:

Friends forever! ♫

Ichimichi Mao and Yui Koike
[ Luka Millfy / Gokai Yellow & Ahim de Famille / Gokai Pink ]

yssadalawa: sokka: my first girlfriend turned into the moon....

Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:29:49 -0500

yssadalawa:

sokka: my first girlfriend turned into the moon.
zuko: that’s rough buddy.

#best line ever

lefuulei: kittenhugs: bluedogeyes: You are not like...

Sat, 07 Jan 2012 22:27:09 -0500

lefuulei:

kittenhugs:

bluedogeyes:

You are not like the others…

;____;

GOD DAMNIT NOW I’M CRYING

thedrunkenmoogle: Phoenix Wright and Miles Edgeworth...

Sat, 07 Jan 2012 22:24:11 -0500

thedrunkenmoogle:

Phoenix Wright and Miles Edgeworth Wine

Lawyer/adventure game series Phoenix Wright, known as Gyakuten Saiban in Japan, is 10 years old! To celebrate a decade of solving crimes while dabbling in paranormal activities, Capcom has released a limited edition wine package. Included are two bottles of wine, one white and one red, representing Phoenix and Edgeworth. “Genius Red” is the name of Edgeworth’s, while “Heat White” is the name of Pheonix’s white wine. The package also includes a wine glass with an etching of the Blue Badger, the mascot of the police force in the games.

Unfortunately, the wine is only available in Japan. If you’re lucky enough to live there, you can buy it for 4,725 yen.

Phoenix Wright 10th Anniversary Wine from Animate Online Shop - 4,725 yen

:(

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 22:15:54 -0500

This. A thousand times this. I can understand where people...

Wed, 09 Nov 2011 12:06:57 -0500

This. A thousand times this. I can understand where people would think “oh, he’s already dead,” but he’s proven quite well that he’s very much alive. If they pulled the “oh, he’s already dead” thing, they’d just be presenting another Philip character, which it’s not been long enough to do that if you ask me.

I seriously don’t understand the hate Gai gets or how people can perceive that he’s “dead.” The man is an embodiment of all of our collective love of Super Sentai. We should all identify with him and want to be him, not see him stripped of his life because you want drama or intrigue. You’re all forgetting the demographic for this series, which is little kids. I bet little kids are identifying with him as well, envying how he’s living out the ultimate nerd dream of meeting his heroes and being a hero. Isn’t that every little kid’s dream? And if you were that child, watching Gai doing exactly what you want to be doing, would you really want for him to die or already be dead? That would be a dream killer. If he died, it would mean that chancing your dreams will only end in suffering; it he’s already dead, that means that dreams can’t be obtained in the living world.

I don’t think he’s dead. He was given a second chance at life to be a hero that humans can look up to and be proud of. That’s not Gai being a zombie; that’s Gai being saved by the very heroes he idolizes to become a hero in their stead. If he died, it would mean that he can no longer meet his fellow heroes or live in a world where heroes live on.

I want him to live because he is living a dream that none of us can have. I want him to be alive to continue living that dream. I want him to be the ambassador of my desire; I want him to be an eternal hero.

Photo

Fri, 07 Oct 2011 12:02:20 -0400